DSpace Repository

Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate alone or associated with band ligation in the prevention of recurrent bleeding: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Show simple item record

dc.creator García Pagán, Juan Carlos
dc.creator Villanueva Sánchez, Càndid
dc.creator Albillos, Agustín
dc.creator Bañares, Rafael
dc.creator Morillas Cunill, Rosa María
dc.creator Abraldes, Juan G.
dc.creator Bosch i Genover, Jaume
dc.date 2011-07-07T12:30:43Z
dc.date 2011-07-07T12:30:43Z
dc.date 2009
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-16T10:27:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-16T10:27:15Z
dc.identifier 0017-5749
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/2445/18665
dc.identifier 581089
dc.identifier 19218249
dc.identifier.uri http://fima-docencia.ub.edu:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/22153
dc.description Background and aims: Previous clinical trials suggest that adding non-selective beta-blockers improves the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) in the prevention of recurrent bleeding, but no study has evaluated whether EBL improves the efficacy of beta-blockers + isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The present study was aimed at evaluating this issue in a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) and to correlate changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during treatment with clinical outcomes. Methods: 158 patients with cirrhosis, admitted because of variceal bleeding, were randomised to receive nadolol+isosorbide-5-mononitrate alone (Drug: n=78) or combined with EBL (Drug+EBL; n=80). HVPG measurements were performed at randomisation and after 4¿6 weeks on medical therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 15 months. One-year probability of recurrent bleeding was similar in both groups (33% vs 26%: p=0.3). There were no significant differences in survival or need of rescue shunts. Overall adverse events or those requiring hospital admission were significantly more frequent in the Drug+EBL group. Recurrent bleeding was significantly more frequent in HVPG non-responders than in responders (HVPG reduction ¿20% or ¿12 mm Hg). Among non-responders recurrent bleeding was similar in patients treated with Drugs or Drugs+EBL. Conclusions: Adding EBL to pharmacological treatment did not reduce recurrent bleeding, the need for rescue therapy, or mortality, and was associated with more adverse events. Furthermore, associating EBL to drug therapy did not reduce the high rebleeding risk of HVPG non-responders.
dc.format 7 p.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher BMJ Group
dc.relation Reproducció digital del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.171207
dc.relation Gut, 2009, vol. 58, núm. 8, p.1144-1150
dc.relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.171207
dc.rights (c) BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology, 2009
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject Hemorràgia
dc.subject Vasodilatadors
dc.subject Beta-blocadors
dc.subject Cirrosi hepàtica
dc.subject Hemorrhage
dc.subject Vasodilators
dc.subject Adrenergic beta blockers
dc.subject Hepatic cirrhosis
dc.title Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate alone or associated with band ligation in the prevention of recurrent bleeding: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account